Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:09:39 -0500 | | From | Jeff Garzik <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sata_nv.c, don't have libata perform phy reset |
| |
achew wrote: > This patch works around the issue reported in bug 3352 on the bugzilla > bug database. > > Link to the bug report: http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug_cgi?id=3352 > > In particular, we keep libata from performing the phy reset. Doing the > phy reset sometimes results in the busy bit failing to deassert. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Chew <achew@nvidia.com> > > > --- linux-2.6.10-rc1-bk15/drivers/scsi/sata_nv.c 2004-11-05 > 17:49:37.000000000 -0800 > +++ linux/drivers/scsi/sata_nv.c 2004-11-05 17:55:48.000000000 -0800 > @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ > * If you do not delete the provisions above, a recipient may use your > * version of this file under either the OSL or the GPL. > * > + * 0.04 > + * - Disabled SATA phy reset to work around a problem where busy > bit never > + * deasserts after a phy reset. > * 0.03 > * - Fixed a bug where the hotplug handlers for non-CK804/MCP04 were > using > * mmio_base, which is only set for the CK804/MCP04 case. > @@ -44,7 +47,7 @@ > #include <linux/libata.h> > > #define DRV_NAME "sata_nv" > -#define DRV_VERSION "0.03" > +#define DRV_VERSION "0.04" > > #define NV_PORTS 2 > #define NV_PIO_MASK 0x1f > @@ -221,7 +224,6 @@ > static struct ata_port_info nv_port_info = { > .sht = &nv_sht, > .host_flags = ATA_FLAG_SATA | > - ATA_FLAG_SATA_RESET | > ATA_FLAG_SRST |
I'm not quite ready to apply this just yet. Reasons:
1) The code has two resets! I think it would be best to remove ATA_FLAG_SRST, since SATA reset should cover that.
2) Once ATA_FLAG_SRST is removed, if the problem still appears, I would prefer that you root-caused this problem. If it's a problem with the generic libata SATA reset code, I would prefer to fix that, rather than keep working around a bug that should be fixed.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |