[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: support of older compilers

    On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Grzegorz Kulewski wrote:
    > And using ramfs for anything else can easily lead to similar problems. So
    > I think we do not need ramfs. Am I wrong? [I understand that removing it
    > will not remove much code.]

    ramfs is very useful as a minimal filesystem for showing what the VFS
    interfaces are, and also (I believe) used in embedded environments, where
    it's simply the smallest possible thing, and swap isn't available anyway.

    You can just disable it if you don't want it..

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.019 / U:8.448 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site