[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: support of older compilers
    On Thursday 04 Nov 2004 17:04, wrote:
    > On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 10:50:38 CST, Adam Heath said:
    > > I didn't deny the speed difference of older and newer compilers.
    > >
    > > But why is this an issue when compiling a kernel? How often do you
    > > compile your kernel?
    > If you're working on older hardware (note the number of people on this
    > list still using 500mz Pentium3 and similar), and a kernel developer, the
    > difference between 2 hours to build a kernel and 4 hours to build a
    > kernel matters quite a bit.

    How often is it necessary to do a full rebuild of the kernel? If the
    dependencies in the make system work properly then only the amended parts
    should be recompiled. That'd be a much bigger time saving than just using an
    older compiler.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.020 / U:0.100 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site