[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Splitting kernel headers and deprecating __KERNEL__

On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > I really disagree. That's kind of my point. We _can_ make sure that there
> > is abzolutely zero semantic content change.
> We've _never_ made sure that there's absolutely zero semantic content
> change in our private headers.

Not true. For example, I don't take spelling fixes that do semantic
content changes.

See? The more trivial the fix, the more obviously correct it has to be.

This isn't even a "fix". It's a cleanup. It goes under the same rules a
spelling fix does.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.157 / U:4.976 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site