[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Splitting kernel headers and deprecating __KERNEL__

On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, David Woodhouse wrote:
> The concept isn't at all hard to understand. But no patch is 'obviously
> correct' if you want to protect against the _slightest_ possibility that
> people might be abusing something you're taking away.

I really disagree. That's kind of my point. We _can_ make sure that there
is abzolutely zero semantic content change.

People both inside and outside the kernel who use the old <linux/xxx.h>
headers will get exactly what they got before if we do it right.

> Some people might define __KERNEL__ on purpose when compiling something
> in userspace, to get something that would otherwise be hidden from them.
> Would you consider that sacrosanct too?

Why _do_ you want to break things? Do the cleanup. Don't do the breakage.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.121 / U:4.656 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site