lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 09/20] uml: use SIG_IGN for empty sighandler
Date
On Thursday 04 November 2004 05:51, Jeff Dike wrote:
> blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it said:
> > Avoid creating a dummy no-op procedure instead of using SIG_IGN.
>
> Andrew, can you hold off on this one?

> I did that on purpose, and as soon
> as I remember why, I'll know whether this patch is good :-)
I had a doubt on this, but I was not getting much feedback from you...
Also, if you reject this, I'd require a comment-only patch for it:
"as soon as I remember why" makes me think back to my yesterday's class, when
the teacher said "put comments in your code or you'll soon forget what it
does!" 8-O (yes, 1st year University student :-( ).

> The other patches are OK by me. Consider them acked.
Very fine.

--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.590 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site