Messages in this thread | | | From | Blaisorblade <> | Subject | Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 09/20] uml: use SIG_IGN for empty sighandler | Date | Thu, 4 Nov 2004 05:11:44 +0100 |
| |
On Thursday 04 November 2004 05:51, Jeff Dike wrote: > blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it said: > > Avoid creating a dummy no-op procedure instead of using SIG_IGN. > > Andrew, can you hold off on this one?
> I did that on purpose, and as soon > as I remember why, I'll know whether this patch is good :-) I had a doubt on this, but I was not getting much feedback from you... Also, if you reject this, I'd require a comment-only patch for it: "as soon as I remember why" makes me think back to my yesterday's class, when the teacher said "put comments in your code or you'll soon forget what it does!" 8-O (yes, 1st year University student :-( ).
> The other patches are OK by me. Consider them acked. Very fine.
-- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |