Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:55:29 -0800 | From | Pete Zaitcev <> | Subject | Re: ub: oops with preempt ("Sahara Workshop") [u] |
| |
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 23:38:15 +0200, "Martin Schlemmer [c]" <azarah@nosferatu.za.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 10:02 -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > I admit that the code should be locked properly instead, but the global plan > > is to drop all P3 tagged printks anyway. So let it be guarded for the moment.
> Sorry for the delay, but I have not had any time to really test this > again. I did some minor testing, and only after really working it, > I could get an oops, but not nearly the same (think it was deeper into > the scsi layer or maybe kobject stuff).
This is strange, because ub hasn't got any connection with SCSI layer.
Without trying to deflect the blame for improper locking in ub, I have to ask, does it all work without the preempt for you?
-- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |