[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Suspend 2 merge

    > > > Again, when you're running on limited time, twice as fast is still twice
    > > > as fast.
    > >
    > > My machine suspends in 7 seconds, and that's swsusp1. According to
    > > your numbers, suspend2 should suspend it in 1 second and LZE
    > > compressed should be .5 second.
    > >
    > > I'd say "who cares". 7 seconds seems like fast enough for me. And I'm
    > > *not* going to add 2000 lines of code for 500msec speedup during
    > > suspend.
    > Yupp. Premature optimization is the roo of all evil. swsusp is
    > a) an absolute slowpath compared to any normal kernel operation,
    > and called extremly seldomly
    > b) only usefull for a small subset of all linux instances
    > hacking core code (fastpathes) for speedups there is a really bad idea.
    > If you can speed it up without beeing intrusive all power to you.

    I have to agree here. Swsusp is not really performance critical,
    almost every other part of kernel is more important.

    People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
    ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.019 / U:234.548 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site