lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Suspend 2 merge
    Hi!

    > > > Again, when you're running on limited time, twice as fast is still twice
    > > > as fast.
    > >
    > > My machine suspends in 7 seconds, and that's swsusp1. According to
    > > your numbers, suspend2 should suspend it in 1 second and LZE
    > > compressed should be .5 second.
    > >
    > > I'd say "who cares". 7 seconds seems like fast enough for me. And I'm
    > > *not* going to add 2000 lines of code for 500msec speedup during
    > > suspend.
    >
    > Yupp. Premature optimization is the roo of all evil. swsusp is
    >
    > a) an absolute slowpath compared to any normal kernel operation,
    > and called extremly seldomly
    > b) only usefull for a small subset of all linux instances
    >
    > hacking core code (fastpathes) for speedups there is a really bad idea.
    > If you can speed it up without beeing intrusive all power to you.

    I have to agree here. Swsusp is not really performance critical,
    almost every other part of kernel is more important.

    Pavel
    --
    People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
    ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.020 / U:89.964 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site