[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Suspend 2 merge

> > > Again, when you're running on limited time, twice as fast is still twice
> > > as fast.
> >
> > My machine suspends in 7 seconds, and that's swsusp1. According to
> > your numbers, suspend2 should suspend it in 1 second and LZE
> > compressed should be .5 second.
> >
> > I'd say "who cares". 7 seconds seems like fast enough for me. And I'm
> > *not* going to add 2000 lines of code for 500msec speedup during
> > suspend.
> Yupp. Premature optimization is the roo of all evil. swsusp is
> a) an absolute slowpath compared to any normal kernel operation,
> and called extremly seldomly
> b) only usefull for a small subset of all linux instances
> hacking core code (fastpathes) for speedups there is a really bad idea.
> If you can speed it up without beeing intrusive all power to you.

I have to agree here. Swsusp is not really performance critical,
almost every other part of kernel is more important.

People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.339 / U:60.580 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site