Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:53:09 +0100 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Sync in core time granuality with filesystems |
| |
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 01:43:40AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> writes: > > > diff -urpN -X ../KDIFX linux-2.6.10rc2/fs/jfs/namei.c linux-2.6.10rc2-time/fs/jfs/namei.c > > --- linux-2.6.10rc2/fs/jfs/namei.c 2004-10-19 01:55:28.000000000 +0200 > > +++ linux-2.6.10rc2-time/fs/jfs/namei.c 2004-11-21 23:27:52.000000000 +0100 > > @@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@ static int jfs_rename(struct inode *old_ > > old_ip->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME; > > mark_inode_dirty(old_ip); > > > > - new_dir->i_ctime = new_dir->i_mtime = CURRENT_TIME; > > + new_dir->i_ctime = new_dir->i_mtime = current_fs_time(new_dir->i_sb); > > mark_inode_dirty(new_dir); > > > > /* Build list of inodes modified by this transaction */ > > @@ -1245,7 +1245,7 @@ static int jfs_rename(struct inode *old_ > > > > if (old_dir != new_dir) { > > iplist[ipcount++] = new_dir; > > - old_dir->i_ctime = old_dir->i_mtime = CURRENT_TIME; > > + old_dir->i_ctime = old_dir->i_mtime = CURRENT_TIME; > > Is this supposed to be CURRENT_TIME_SEC?
No, JFS supports nanosecond resolution. The first hunk could stay at CURRENT_TIME, but it doesn't matter much (would be just a small optimization)
-Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |