Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:12:00 -0500 (EST) | From | linux-os <> | Subject | Re: Isolating two network processes on same machine |
| |
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, linux-os wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Lee Revell wrote: > >> On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 11:23 -0500, linux-os wrote: >>> I was going to say, set the netmask small enough so that both >>> machines are on different networks and set default routes to >>> your gateway.... But there is a bug somewhere that doesn't >>> allow a netmask of anything but 0 in the last byte. >>> >> >> Really? That would be a horrible bug. How about some references? >> >> Lee >> > > Huh? Try it........ > > Script started on Wed 24 Nov 2004 12:03:43 PM EST > # ifconfig eth1 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.7 > SIOCSIFNETMASK: Invalid argument > # ifconfig eth1 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.0 > # exit > > Script done on Wed 24 Nov 2004 12:04:42 PM EST >
Well I guess you can set it to:
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:5A:27:7B:16 inet addr:1.3.4.5 Bcast:1.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.252 ^^^ inet6 addr: fe80::210:5aff:fe27:7b16/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:68120 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:5 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:3 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:4383953 (4.1 Mb) TX bytes:378 (378.0 b) Interrupt:22 Base address:0xbc00
That should ne able to isolate the two machines on the same wire.
Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.6.9 on an i686 machine (5537.79 BogoMips). Notice : All mail here is now cached for review by John Ashcroft. 98.36% of all statistics are fiction. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |