lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-V0.7.29-0, and 30-9
From
Date
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 16:22 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Just curious to why you scale the interrupts from 49 down to 25. What
> would be wrong with keeping all of them at 49 (or whatever). Being a
> FIFO, no interrupt would preempt another. Why would you want the first
> IRQs to be registered have higher priority than (and thus will preempt)
> irqs registered later.

I raised this issue before. I agree that all interrupts should get the
same RT prio by default. Otherwise the default behavior is arbitrary.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.060 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site