[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: ptrace single-stepping change breaks Wine

On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <> writes:
> > Now, try to "strace" it, or debug it with gdb, and see if you can repeat
> > the behaviour.
> You'll always have hard time repeating that under strace or gdb, since a
> debugger uses SIGTRAP for it's own purpose and does not pass it to the
> program.

Sure. But "hard time" and "impossible" are two different things.

It _should_ be perfectly easy to debug this, by using

signal SIGTRAP

instead of "continue" when you get a SIGTRAP that wasn't due to anything
you did.

But try it. It doesn't work. Why? Because the kernel will have cleared TF
on the signal stack, so even when you do a "signal SIGTRAP", it will only
run the trap handler _once_, even though it should run it three times
(once for each instruction in between the "popfl"s.

I do think this is actually a bug, although whether it's the bug that
causes problems for Wine is not clear at all. I'mm too lazy to build
and boot an older kernel, but I bet that on an older kernel you _can_ do
"signal SIGTRAP" three times, and it will work correctly. That would
indeed make this a regression.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.061 / U:8.716 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site