Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 20 Nov 2004 11:02:35 +0100 (MET) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: inline (and variants) function modifier |
| |
>May I ask how one is supposed to write a non-static function and let the >compiler decide whether it is worth inlining? Since all of 'inline', >'__inline', and '__inline__' get __attribute__((always_inline)) >attached, I can't see how I would currently do this. Wouldn't it make >sense to leave at least one of the three with its original meaning?
The only way I see ATM is to: #undef inline
Then inline and __attribute__((always_inline)) are "independent" again.
Jan Engelhardt -- Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung Am Fassberg, 37077 Göttingen, www.gwdg.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |