lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: inline (and variants) function modifier
>May I ask how one is supposed to write a non-static function and let the
>compiler decide whether it is worth inlining? Since all of 'inline',
>'__inline', and '__inline__' get __attribute__((always_inline))
>attached, I can't see how I would currently do this. Wouldn't it make
>sense to leave at least one of the three with its original meaning?

The only way I see ATM is to:
#undef inline

Then inline and __attribute__((always_inline)) are "independent" again.



Jan Engelhardt
--
Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung
Am Fassberg, 37077 Göttingen, www.gwdg.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.154 / U:1.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site