Messages in this thread | | | From | "Chen, Kenneth W" <> | Subject | RE: [RFC][PATCH] sched: aggressive idle balance | Date | Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:29:52 -0800 |
| |
Andrew Theurer wrote on Tuesday, November 02, 2004 12:17 PM > > So far we have seen 3-5% with these patches on online transaction workolads > and no regressions on SDET. Kenneth, I am particularly interested in using > this with your increased cache_hot_time value, where you got your best > throughput: > > ...but still had idle time. Do you think you could try these patches with > your 25ms cache_hot_time? I think your workload could benefit from both the > longer cache_hot_time for busy cpus, but more aggressive idle balances, > hopefully driving your workload to 100% cpu utilization.
Looks interesting, I will queue this up on our benchmark setup.
- Ken
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |