lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [discuss] Re: RFC: let x86_64 no longer define X86
From
Date
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 11:34 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Basically what Paul Menage said. There is a lot of common code,
> and you would end up writing X86 && X86_64 more often than
> X86 && !X86_64.

(assuming you meant the first to be X86 || X86_64)

Can you show some examples? We don't have this for any other
architecture.

--
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:2.287 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site