[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [discuss] Re: RFC: let x86_64 no longer define X86
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 05:21:22AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 01:51:17AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> >>I'd like to send a patch after 2.6.10 that removes the following from
> >>arch/x86_64/Kconfig:
> >>
> >> config X86
> >> bool
> >> default y
> >
> >
> >I'm against this. Please don't do this.
> An explanation would be nice.

Basically what Paul Menage said. There is a lot of common code,
and you would end up writing X86 && X86_64 more often than
X86 && !X86_64.

In addition such a change is quite intrusive and I don't
think it's a good idea to do right now because it'll very
likely introduce bugs.

If someone really thinks the X86 && !X86_64 is too ugly
(I personally don't think it is because it says clearly
what the matter is) then adding an additional X86_32 would be the right
thing to do.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.076 / U:0.628 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site