Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:43:50 +0300 | From | "Vladimir B. Savkin" <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.10-rc2 |
| |
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 06:01:00PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 09:59:00AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Nope. It got fixed differently: by only adding POSIX locks to the list. > > See locks_insert_block(). Since a non-posix lock cannot be blocked by a > > POSIX lock, the "if (IS_POSIX(blocker))" test should make sure we're > > always proper. > > > > At least that's Willy claims. If you think he's wrong, holler. > > > > Willy Cc'd, once more. > > The problem certainly should have been fixed. I'd like to know if it > still occurs. >
It does not, thank you.
~ :wq With best regards, Vladimir Savkin.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |