[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 1] Xen core patch : ptep_establish_new
    > On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 11:46:50PM +0000, Ian Pratt wrote:
    > >
    > > This patch adds 'ptep_establish_new', in keeping with the
    > > existing 'ptep_establish', but for use where a mapping is being
    > > established where there was previously none present. This
    > > function is useful (rather than just using set_pte) because
    > > having the virtual address available enables a very important
    > > optimisation for arch-xen. We introduce
    > > HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_ESTABLISH_NEW and define a generic implementation
    > > in asm-generic/pgtable.h, following the pattern of the existing
    > > ptep_establish.
    > What would be the problem of always passing the virtual address to
    > ptep_establish? We already have a rather twisted maze of pte manipulation
    > macros.

    ptep_establish already takes a virtual address. Perhaps you mean
    'set_pte'? That would work, but is a much bigger change that
    would impact all architectures. I think introducing
    ptep_establish_new is cleaner.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.027 / U:38.096 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site