Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:03:00 -0700 (MST) | From | Zwane Mwaikambo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Intel thermal monitor for x86_64 |
| |
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Andi Kleen wrote:
> No, I was just worried about the locking issues. Ok it was my mistake > then I assume you used an NMI LVT setup. Without NMI using printk > is fine and simpler. Can you change it to do that directly? > > Putting events additionally into mcelog would be still nice though. > > > > Also can you at least additionally log an synthetic event using mce_log() ? > > > This way someone collecting these log entries centrally get its it > > > all in the same log file. > > > > Ok, then i think we need to make the mce logging capable of storing > > extended information, is the code i did for i386 ok with you? > > No, see my other mail for that. > > for the thermtrips I would just redefine some fields and invent > a magic high bank number.
Thanks for the input Andi, i'll rework the patch.
Zwane - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |