lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Intel thermal monitor for x86_64
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Andi Kleen wrote:

> No, I was just worried about the locking issues. Ok it was my mistake
> then I assume you used an NMI LVT setup. Without NMI using printk
> is fine and simpler. Can you change it to do that directly?
>
> Putting events additionally into mcelog would be still nice though.
>
> > > Also can you at least additionally log an synthetic event using mce_log() ?
> > > This way someone collecting these log entries centrally get its it
> > > all in the same log file.
> >
> > Ok, then i think we need to make the mce logging capable of storing
> > extended information, is the code i did for i386 ok with you?
>
> No, see my other mail for that.
>
> for the thermtrips I would just redefine some fields and invent
> a magic high bank number.

Thanks for the input Andi, i'll rework the patch.

Zwane
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:3.570 / U:1.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site