lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Patch] export sched_setscheduler() for kernel module use

* Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >Using the linear priority has the
> >advantage of not having to pass any policy value - priorities between 0
> >and 99 implicitly mean SCHED_FIFO, priorities above that would mean
> >SCHED_NORMAL, a pretty natural and compact interface.
>
> Just curious--why FIFO and not RR?

it shouldnt matter - if it matters, i.e. if any of these threads uses up
significant amount of CPU time then they should probably _not_ have a RT
priority to begin with.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.059 / U:0.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site