Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:05:17 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [Patch] export sched_setscheduler() for kernel module use |
| |
* Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote: > >Using the linear priority has the > >advantage of not having to pass any policy value - priorities between 0 > >and 99 implicitly mean SCHED_FIFO, priorities above that would mean > >SCHED_NORMAL, a pretty natural and compact interface. > > Just curious--why FIFO and not RR?
it shouldnt matter - if it matters, i.e. if any of these threads uses up significant amount of CPU time then they should probably _not_ have a RT priority to begin with.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |