Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:35:46 +0100 | From | Erik Mouw <> | Subject | Re: GPL version, "at your option"? |
| |
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:08:35PM +0100, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote: > I'm about to submit a patch for a new cipher mode called LRW, adding new > code/files to the crypto tree. My question is, especially to the > maintainers: Are you going to accept code covered by the terms: > > * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > * the Free Software Foundation, version 2 of the License.
There's already quite some code that's only licensed with GPLv2. Look for example at arch/arm/common/dmabounce.c which does the same as you want but with slightly different words:
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License * version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
If you are the author, you can choose the license you like.
Erik (IANAL, etc.)
-- +-- Erik Mouw -- www.harddisk-recovery.com -- +31 70 370 12 90 -- | Lab address: Delftechpark 26, 2628 XH, Delft, The Netherlands - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |