[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: CPU hogs ignoring SIGTERM (unkillable processes)
    "Ulrich Windl" <> writes:

    > Hello,
    > today I've discovered a programming error in one of my programs (that's fixed
    > already). When trying to replace the binary, I found out that the processes seem
    > unaffected by a plain "kill": They just continue to consume CPU. However, a "kill
    > -9" terminates them. ist that intended behavior? I guess not. Here are some facts:

    Are you sure it doesn't block or ignore the signal?


    Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs,
    SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
    Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
    "And now for something completely different."
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.021 / U:141.780 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site