[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: CPU hogs ignoring SIGTERM (unkillable processes)
"Ulrich Windl" <> writes:

> Hello,
> today I've discovered a programming error in one of my programs (that's fixed
> already). When trying to replace the binary, I found out that the processes seem
> unaffected by a plain "kill": They just continue to consume CPU. However, a "kill
> -9" terminates them. ist that intended behavior? I guess not. Here are some facts:

Are you sure it doesn't block or ignore the signal?


Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs,
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.060 / U:10.492 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site