[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Workaround for wrapping loadaverage
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 08:49:41AM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> >but I agree that a higher resolution would be a good
> >idea ... also doing the calculation when the number
> >of running/uninterruptible processes has changed would
> >be a good idea ...
> This could get very expensive. A modern cpu can do about 700,000 context
> switches per second of a real task with the current linux kernel so I'd
> suggest not doing this.

hmm, right it can, do you have any stats about the
'typical' workload behaviour?

do you know the average time between changes of
nr_running and nr_uninterruptible?


> Cheers,
> Con

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.040 / U:6.224 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site