[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox +code
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Maw, 2004-11-09 at 20:23, David Schwartz wrote:
> > Yes, they do. The whole point of the "additional restrictions" clause is to
> > *prohibit* other contracts or obligations that act to restrict your ability
> > to exercise the rights under the GPL.
> Correct. But you can exercise your rights under the GPL in this case.

Let's slightly modify the parameters...

What if someone would offer you binaries (under the GPL) if you sign a contract
that you will have to pay 100000 EUR (or 100000000 EUR, or ...) if you exercise
your rights under the GPL?

According to your reasoning, this is allowed, since you can still exercise your
rights under the GPL. But in practice this would mean that someone found out
how to take GPL software, and not give back...



Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.080 / U:10.904 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site