[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: DEVFS_FS
    On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 07:06:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
    > On Wednesday 10 November 2004 16:03, Alexandre Costa wrote:
    > >On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:46:06 -0500 (EST), linux-os
    > >
    > ><> wrote:
    > >> What is the approved substitute for DEVFS_FS that is marked
    > >> obsolete?
    > >
    > >udev
    > >
    > Humm, I'm not sure I'm entirely happy with that choice. I have an
    > FC3RC5 install on an old P-II running at 233mhz, and the udev start
    > in the bootup is the slowest single thing to get started by an order
    > of magnitude.
    > Can someone tell me a good reason udev wastes as much time as the post
    > does checking 383 megs of memory, which is very nearly a minute even
    > just for udev?

    It's all up to the rules you are using for udev. If you have udev rules
    that call out to scripts for every device (like I think the SuSE default
    install does), udevstart can take a long time.

    If you don't have any external dependancies, udevstart is fast.

    > If its to be used, its got to speed itself up, a LOT!.

    Please post what version of udev you are using, and what your udev rules
    file looks like.


    greg k-h
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.020 / U:113.820 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site