[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: DEVFS_FS
On Wednesday 10 November 2004 16:03, Alexandre Costa wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:46:06 -0500 (EST), linux-os
><> wrote:
>> What is the approved substitute for DEVFS_FS that is marked
>> obsolete?

Humm, I'm not sure I'm entirely happy with that choice. I have an
FC3RC5 install on an old P-II running at 233mhz, and the udev start
in the bootup is the slowest single thing to get started by an order
of magnitude.

Can someone tell me a good reason udev wastes as much time as the post
does checking 383 megs of memory, which is very nearly a minute even
just for udev?

If its to be used, its got to speed itself up, a LOT!.

Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.28% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly attorneys please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.034 / U:1.024 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site