lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.23

* Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com <Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com> wrote:

> OK. So maybe I didn't understand what you said previously. Now, if I
> build to get maximum-latency wakeup values, I can't get the IRQ off or
> preempt off timing and traces? If that's not true, how do I switch
> between the different sampling methods?

you have to build another kernel for them. irqs-off and preempt-off
timing can be mixed freely (and both can be enabled in the same kernel),
but wakeup timing deserves its own .config space and since it's not
mixable with the other two methods i didnt see much point in enabling
all 3 at once with strange dependencies between them. Is this a big
issue? Normally i think the wakeup timing is more than enough to get a
feel of latencies, and if something specific is suspected the other ones
can be turned on.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.020 / U:18.372 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site