lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE] Linux 2.6 Real Time Kernel
Date
Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> writes:

>> > > To the best of my understanding, this still doesn't provide
>> > > deterministic hard-real-time performance in Linux.
>> >
>> > Using only the VP+IRQ thread patch, I ran my RT app for 11 million
>> > cycles yesterday, with a maximum delay of 190 usecs. How would this not
>> > satisfy a 200 usec hard RT constraint?
>>
>> I think the keyword here is "deterministic", isn't it?
>
> Well, depends what you mean by deterministic. Some RT apps only require
> an upper bound on response time. This is a form of determinism.

Sure, but running for a zillion cycles without breaking some limit
doesn't guarantee that it never will happen. Being able to give such
a guarantee is what determinism is about.

--
Måns Rullgård
mru@mru.ath.cx

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans