lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE] Linux 2.6 Real Time Kernel
From
Date
On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 17:26, stefan.eletzhofer@eletztrick.de wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 02:30:28PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 13:41, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> > > Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote:
> > > > - Voluntary Preemption by Ingo Molnar
> > > > - IRQ thread patches by Scott Wood and Ingo Molnar
> > > > - BKL mutex patch by Ingo Molnar (with MV extensions)
> > > > - PMutex from Germany's Universitaet der Bundeswehr, Munich
> > > > - MontaVista mutex abstraction layer replacing spinlocks with mutexes
> > >
> > > To the best of my understanding, this still doesn't provide deterministic
> > > hard-real-time performance in Linux.
> >
> > Using only the VP+IRQ thread patch, I ran my RT app for 11 million
> > cycles yesterday, with a maximum delay of 190 usecs. How would this not
> > satisfy a 200 usec hard RT constraint?
>
> I think the keyword here is "deterministic", isn't it?

Well, depends what you mean by deterministic. Some RT apps only require
an upper bound on response time. This is a form of determinism.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.072 / U:26.676 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site