lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement
    Matthew writes:
    > > CKRM aspires to be both a general purpose resource management framework
    > > and the embodiment of fair share scheduling.
    >
    > I think your missing something here. CKRM, as I understand it, aspires
    > to be a general purpose resource management framework. To that point I
    > will accede. But the second part, about CKRM being the embodiment of
    > fair share scheduling, is secondary.

    Ok - you may well be right that CKRM does not aspire to be the embodiment
    of fair share scheduling. But doesn't it embody a fair share sheduler
    (and no other such policy) as a matter of current implementation fact?

    --
    I won't rest till it's the best ...
    Programmer, Linux Scalability
    Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.021 / U:1.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site