Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 09 Oct 2004 09:50:30 +1000 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC PATCH] scheduler: Dynamic sched_domains |
| |
Erich Focht wrote:
>>I personally like the hierarchical idea. Machine topologies tend to >>look tree-like, and every useful sched_domain layout I've ever seen has >>been tree-like. I think our interface should match that. > > > I like the hierarchical idea, too. The natural way to build it would > be by starting from the cpus and going up. This tree stands on its > leafs... and I'm not sure how to express that in a filesystem. >
Why would you ever want to play around with the internals of the thing though? Provided you have a way to create exclusive sets of CPUs, when would you care about doing more? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |