lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] [RFC PATCH] scheduler: Dynamic sched_domains
    Erich Focht wrote:

    >>I personally like the hierarchical idea. Machine topologies tend to
    >>look tree-like, and every useful sched_domain layout I've ever seen has
    >>been tree-like. I think our interface should match that.
    >
    >
    > I like the hierarchical idea, too. The natural way to build it would
    > be by starting from the cpus and going up. This tree stands on its
    > leafs... and I'm not sure how to express that in a filesystem.
    >

    Why would you ever want to play around with the internals of the
    thing though? Provided you have a way to create exclusive sets of
    CPUs, when would you care about doing more?
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:4.316 / U:0.048 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site