lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug?
    On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 02:19:37 +0200
    Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com> wrote:

    > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:35:21PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
    > > On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 22:06:08 +0200
    > > Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com> wrote:
    > >
    > > > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 12:43:27PM -0700, Hua Zhong wrote:
    > > > > How hard is it to treat the next read to the fd as NON_BLOCKING, even if
    > > > > it's not set?
    > > >
    > > > Programs don't expect EAGAIN from blocking sockets.
    > >
    > > That's right, which is why we block instead.
    >
    > Programs don't expect a read to block after a positive select either,
    > so it doesn't really help.

    It absolutely does help the programs not using select(), using
    blocking sockets, and not expecting -EAGAIN.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.019 / U:60.452 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site