lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: new dev model (was Re: Default cache_hot_time value back to 10ms)
>> it is also correct that the pile of patches in the -mm tree mask the QA
>> effects of testing done on -mm, so testing -BK separately is just as
>> important at this stage.
>
> The simple fact is that -mm doesn't receive _nearly_ the amount of testing that a 2.6.x -BK snapshot does, which in turn doesn't receive _nearly_ the amount of testing that a 2.6.x-rc release gets.

Not sure that's true. Personally I test all -mm releases, and not -bk
snapshots ... I've heard similar from other people.

If everyone pushed their stuff through -mm, and it sat there for a few
days before going upstream, we'd get a much better opportunity to test.

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:1.225 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site