lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: new dev model (was Re: Default cache_hot_time value back to 10ms)
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > So my own suggestions for increasing 2.6.x stability are:
>
> And one more, that I meant to include in the last email,
>
> 3) Release early, release often (official -rc releases, not just snapshots)

I guess you mean official -pre releases as well?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

P.S. I only track `real' (-pre and -rc) releases. I don't have the manpower
(what's in a word) to track daily snapshots (I do `read' bk-commits). If
m68k stuff gets broken in -rc, usually it means it won't get fixed before
2 full releases later. Anyway, things shouldn't become broken in -rc,
IMHO that's what we (should) have -pre for...
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.069 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site