Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 6 Oct 2004 22:37:20 +0200 (MEST) | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Subject | Re: new dev model (was Re: Default cache_hot_time value back to 10ms) |
| |
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > So my own suggestions for increasing 2.6.x stability are: > > And one more, that I meant to include in the last email, > > 3) Release early, release often (official -rc releases, not just snapshots)
I guess you mean official -pre releases as well?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
P.S. I only track `real' (-pre and -rc) releases. I don't have the manpower (what's in a word) to track daily snapshots (I do `read' bk-commits). If m68k stuff gets broken in -rc, usually it means it won't get fixed before 2 full releases later. Anyway, things shouldn't become broken in -rc, IMHO that's what we (should) have -pre for... -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |