lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.9-rc3-mm2
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 19:13, Pasi Savolainen wrote:
> > LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> > KSYM .tmp_kallsyms1.S
> > make: *** wait: No child processes. Stop.
> > - -
> > The 'no child processes' keeps on coming up at 'random' moments under
> > rc3-mm1. First time ever that I've seen it otherwise.
>
> Just a simple mee too!
> on 2.6.9-rc3-mm2-VP-T0 and on some earlier Sx patches as well.
> Unfortunatly I haven't had time to track back as to when this was
> introduced.

Please, would you try this patch below that I posted yesterday?
At the time I thought the trylock was hardly used so not urgent.

I've just now discovered that the standard SMP PREEMPT read_lock
- as in do_wait's read_lock(&tasklist_lock) for example - uses it
via one of those dreaded expansions that grep misses:
if (likely(_raw_##op##_trylock(lock)))
I've been suffering the occasional leftover zombie from multiple
kernel builds precisely since the preempt-smp.patch went in; been
hunting it unsuccessfully in spare moments, yesterday noticed that
bug, today realize it's probably what I've been hunting - I'm
about to start my own tests again, can't be sure until tomorrow.

Hugh

The i386 and x86_64 _raw_read_trylocks in preempt-smp.patch
are too successful: atomic_read() returns a signed integer.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>

--- 2.6.9-rc3-mm2/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h 2004-10-04 12:00:14.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h 2004-10-04 18:50:32.752864600 +0100
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static inline int _raw_read_trylock(rwlo
{
atomic_t *count = (atomic_t *)lock;
atomic_dec(count);
- if (atomic_read(count) < RW_LOCK_BIAS)
+ if (atomic_read(count) >= 0)
return 1;
atomic_inc(count);
return 0;
--- 2.6.9-rc3-mm2/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h 2004-10-04 12:00:15.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h 2004-10-04 18:50:32.752864600 +0100
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static inline int _raw_read_trylock(rwlo
{
atomic_t *count = (atomic_t *)lock;
atomic_dec(count);
- if (atomic_read(count) < RW_LOCK_BIAS)
+ if (atomic_read(count) >= 0)
return 1;
atomic_inc(count);
return 0;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans