lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement
    Simon wrote:
    > But now I see that the discussion is going towards:
    > -fully exclusive cpusets, maybe even with no interrupts handling
    > -maybe only allow exclusive cpusets, since non-exclusive cpusets are
    > tricky wrt CKRM.
    >
    > That would be a no-go for us.

    I'm with you there, Simon. Not all cpusets should be exclusive.

    It is reasonable for domain-capable schedulers, allocators and
    resource managers (domain aware CKRM?) require that any domain
    they manage correspond to an exclusive cpuset, for some value
    of exclusive stronger than now.

    Less exclusive cpusets just wouldn't qualify for their own
    scheduler, allocator or resource manager domains.

    --
    I won't rest till it's the best ...
    Programmer, Linux Scalability
    Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:3.680 / U:0.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site