Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 5 Oct 2004 20:15:32 +0100 | From | Matthew Wilcox <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.6 SGI Altix I/O code reorganization |
| |
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:10:08PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote: > > > Maybe rename pci_root_ops to "acpi_pci_ops" would make that clearer. > > > > No. Don't rename it to anything ACPI specific. It isn't. > > I understand raw_pci_ops is not ACPI specific. > But pci_root_ops is only used by pci_acpi_scan_root().
Yes, but if we had other ways of discovering PCI root bridges on ia64, we would use it there too. It's exactly the same as the i386 code which has 7 different ways to discover PCI root bridges.
-- "Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |