Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:53:23 -0400 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: Core scsi layer crashes in 2.6.8.1 |
| |
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 11:57:40AM -0400, Mark Lord wrote: > James Bottomley wrote: > > > >It would add quite a bit of complexity to the reference counted > >aynchronous model to try and force synchronicity between queuecommand > >and scsi_remove_host in the mid-layer. Therefore it's much easier to > >let the LLD decide what to do with the command. > > Presumably the same is also true for scsi_remove_device() ?
What I do in my local hotplug code is assume that the SCSI layer will be stupid and send commands after I call scsi_remove_device(), for an indeterminant but short period of time.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |