[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: BK kernel workflow

> > In Spain, reverse engineering is allowed for interoperability.
> And in lots of other places. Which has been mentioned in this and other
> instances of this discussion for the last 5 years. And the response is
> that BK already gives you documented ways to interoperate, extensively
> documented, in fact. You can get data and/or metadata into and out of
> BK from the command line. You could create your own network protocol,
> client, and server using the documented interfaces that BK has. You
> could create your own CVS2BK tool, your own BK2CVS tool, etc., all
> using documented interfaces.

Actually, I probably could not, due to legal reasons. Or do you tell
me that it is okay for people to develop BK2ARCH importer tool, using
documented interfaces, with free version of bitkeeper?
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.837 / U:0.440 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site