lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: BK kernel workflow
Indeed.  Kyle's comments were clearly without basis in fact.  Saying
that you aren't bound by the terms of the license because you didn't
download the code, your co-worker did, is no different than saying "hey,
look at this! A copy of the Linux kernel! Now how did that get here?
Well, I didn't put it here so I think I'll ignore the terms of the GPL."
Best of luck on that logic.

> > To my knowledge, there has not been a single significant instance of
> > a EULA made _after_ the point-of-sale being found binding by a court
> > of law. There _have_ been many cases where Copyright law forbids
> > some action of a user also forbidden in an EULA, but in no other case
> > have they been upheld.
>
> Now read:
>
> http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/doc/2004/bnetd_30sep.pdf

--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.137 / U:0.872 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site