[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Semaphore assembly-code bug
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Somebody should check what the Pentium M does. It might just notice that
> "lea 4(%esp),%esp" is the same as "add 4 to esp", but it's entirely
> possible that lea will confuse its stack engine logic and cause
> stack-related address generation stalls..

Now especially Intel tells everybody in their Pentium Optimization
manuals to *use* lea whereever possible as this operation doesn't depend
on the ALU and is processed in other parts of the CPU.

Sample quote from said manual (P/N 248966-05):
"Use the lea instruction and the full range of addressing modes to do
address calculation"

I would guess Intel would add caveats about such stalls in this manual
if there would be any.
Andreas Steinmetz SPAMmers use
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.326 / U:8.840 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site