[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: The naming wars continue...
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 05:32:16PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >Which is just another reason why the name itself is not that meaningful.
> >It can never carry the kind of information that people seem to _expect_ it
> >to carry.
> I wasn't going to reply to this since it's your call and I've had my
> say, but since several others have, let me throw out one more idea on
> the off chance you like it:
> Stop doing the pre's on the next version! After 2.6.10 comes
> etc, which everyone can see are incremental changes to 2.6.10, and when
> you really mean it, then put out 2.6.11-rc1.
> Did that strike a nerve?, etc. suggests important bug fixes for 2.6.10, *not* prereleases
of 2.6.11. But... perhaps (with sufficient warning) the even/odd principle
could be applied to the third number. So, this would happen:

2.6.even = release
2.6.even.x = release, with added bug/security fixes
2.6.odd = first (zeroth?) -pre/-rc release
2.6.odd.x = additional -pre/-rc releases

A more concrete example:
2.6.11-rc1, 2.6.11-rc2, 2.6.11-rc3, 2.6.11, 2.6.12-rc1, 2.6.12-rc2, 2.6.12
would become:
2.6.11,,, 2.6.12, 2.6.13,, 2.6.14

How does this sound? (It just occurred to me that this might break
scripts, but it may be worth discussing anyway.)

-Barry K. Nathan <>

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.251 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site