[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: lowmem_reserve (replaces protection)
    On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 02:54:25AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    > I agree. I didn't introduce that bug, the very same problem would happen

    btw, the severity of such performance bug in the LRU screwup, is minor
    compared to the severity of the functional deadlocks or early oom kills
    potentially generated by the lack of lowmem_reserve enabled with proper
    defaults but sure we need to fix the performance LRU issue too.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.018 / U:42.236 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site