Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:00:09 -0400 | From | Chuck Ebbert <> | Subject | Re: My thoughts on the "new development model" |
| |
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 at 10:37:06 -0700 William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> "It works for me" doesn't cut it in the OS world. > > It's an existence proof spanning a wide swath of architectures. If > you are not seeing similar results, send bugreports.
I don't neeed to send in bug reports, there are plenty on l-k right now:
- LVM is currently broken in 2.6.9-mm1 - the RTC and NMI code have a race condition between them - NFS mount won't accept a FQDN over 50 bytes (patch was sent and utterly ignored, then recently reposted) - cdrom driver thinks non-mt. rainier drives are capable
> Point releases are in fact updated and maintained. Those updates > are given the name of the next point release.
Are you saying people who encounter bugs in 2.6.9 should wait for 2.6.10? ...and when they find bugs in _that_ release they should keep waiting? In other words, Zeno was right after all?
--Chuck Ebbert 26-Oct-04 17:23:57 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |