Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] remove dead tcp exports | From | Lee Revell <> | Date | Tue, 26 Oct 2004 01:43:57 -0400 |
| |
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 21:52 -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:41:05 -0400 > Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote: > > > Is this really a compelling reason to remove them? For example ALSA > > provides an API for driver writers, just because a certain function > > happens not to be used by any does not mean is never will be or that it > > should not. > > These are actually TCP internals, not a "well defined driver API" > as ALSA defines. >
Yeah but there was also a patch posted that removed a bunch of "dead exports" from ALSA. I was wondering in general what the standard is for distinguishing the two cases.
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |