lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] posix timers using == instead of & for bitmask tests
>  Thanks for answering my mistaken impressions.  I saw after I wrote that
> SIGEV_SIGNAL == 0 which makes everything work. And I was laboring under
> the misconception that SIGEV_SIGNAL and SIGEV_THREAD were mutually exclusive
> which isn't true, one always has SIGEV_SIGNAL if SIGEV_THREAD is set.

In the semantic sense they are mutually exclusive. They are not so in the
bitwise sense, because the value is really not a bitmask overall, only the
SIGEV_THREAD_ID bit is used that way.


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.048 / U:1.848 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site