[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: my opinion about VGA devices
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 10:27:08AM -0700, Kendall Bennett wrote:
> As for the framebuffer console, it exists purely to get high resolution
> text consoles working with basic graphics capabilities. It was never
> intended to be a complete graphics environment, but just the console that
> can be used in graphics modes. The original versions of the framebuffer
> console code were developed not for x86 machines but for non-x86 machines
> that did not have any VGA capabilities at all (ie: Mac's). For Linux to
> work on such machines, the console needed to be able to output text in
> graphics modes since that is what the machines booted in. Once this was
> done for non-x86 boxes, it was realised this would be a 'cool' feature
> for x86 machines for two reasons. 1 - you get a nice high resolution text
> console, way better than VGA text mode and, 2 - you can display the cool
> penguin logo ;-)

And last but not least - you can have several such framebuffers in a
single machine, possibly for multi-user purposes. VGA
wants to be the only one of its kind . . .

Helge Hafting
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.176 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site