[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux v2.6.9 and GPL Buyout
David Weinehall wrote:

>On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:09:28PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>>No. They seem to have some factual concrete evidence IP covered under
>>agreements was used and subsequently converted into Linux, and they are
>>confident of this. From a cursory viewpoint, it looks valid. I think
>>they have a case
>>(having been sued and nailed for the same type of thing by Novell).
>(Quoting from groklaw wrt that lawsuit:)
>"The judge had a few descriptive words for Mr. Merkey, as you will note
> particularly in paragraph 123 - 125 of the Findings of Fact:
> 124. In fact, however, Merkey is not just prone to exaggeration, he also
> is and can be deceptive, not only to his adversaries, but also to his
> own partners, his business associates and to the court. He deliberately
> describes his own, separate reality."
>Meanwhile, life goes on as usual in the real world.
>Oh, and if you happen to need any code I might have contributed to the
>kernel, it's available under the GPL. Only.
>Regards: David Weinehall
This was written by Novell's stooge Judge Schoefield. It's total
fiction. Don't worry, it will get cleared up soon.

More bugs to find ....

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.276 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site