[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Hugepages demand paging V1 [3/4]: Overcommit handling
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 12:16:26PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> I thought that was the state of the art for hugetlb pages already?

On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 04:21:01AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Only vacuously so, for mainline is not handling hugetlb faults.
> The real impediment to all this is that no one is bothering to dredge
> up architecture manuals for the architectures they're touching to
> create plausible equivalents of update_mmu_cache(), clear_dcache_page()
> (not considered by Lameter's patches at all), et al for hugetlb.

flush_dcache_page(), sorry.

-- wli
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.038 / U:0.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site