[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Hugepages demand paging V1 [3/4]: Overcommit handling
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 04:12:59AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 09:58:26PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> >> Changelog
> >> * overcommit handling
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 12:01:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > overcommit for huge pages sounds like a realy bad idea. Care to explain
> > why you want it?
> It's the opposite of what its name implies; it implements strict
> non-overcommit, in the sense that it tries to prevent the sum of
> possible hugetlb allocations arising from handling hugetlb faults from
> exceeding the size of the hugetlb memory pool.

I thought that was the state of the art for hugetlb pages already?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.060 / U:2.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site